Friday, June 26, 2009

Political Calculations of ENDA

218 votes are needed for passage of ENDA in the House. There are 197 probable yes votes now, according to my calculations. That means unless another 25 come through, ENDA would not pass. However, there are 50 House Democrats are unconfirmed on ENDA (the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, H.R. 3017). There are a number of Republicans who are unconfirmed as well, but few of them are expected to come out publicly for ENDA, though they may vote for it if and when it goes to the House floor.


Where Are These Unconfirmed Legislators?

The largest number of unconfirmed Dems are in the state of Pennsylvania, with 5 unconfirmed Democrats. These are Kathy Dahlkemper, Jason Altmire, Christopher P. Carney, Paul E. Kanjorski and John Murtha. (You can click on the links to email them, though some only accept emails from their own constituents.)

Virginia also has 5 unconfirmed Democrats: Glenn Nye, Robert C. Scott, Tom Perriello, Rick Boucher , and Gerry Connolly Next comes Illinois, with 4 (Bobby L. Rush, Dan Lipinski, Debbie Halvorson, and Jerry F. Costello

New York also has 4: Michael E. McMahon, Scott Murphy, Paul D. Tonko, and Dan Maffei.

Texas has 4: Al Green Solomon P. Ortiz Henry Cuellar and Gene Green

There are also a number of unconfirmed Democrats in other states all over the US. They are: Bobby Bright (AL), Parker Griffith (AL), Vic Snyder (AR), Dennis Cardoza (CA), Sanford Bishop (GA), David Scott (GA), Walt Minnick (ID), Peter Visclosky (IN), Joe Donnelly (IN), Brad Ellsworth (IN), Ben Chandler (KY), Frank Kratovil (MD), Dutch Ruppersburger (MD), Bart Stupak (MI), Mark Schauer (MI), Travis Childers (MS), Bennie Thompson (MS), Dina Titus (NV), Earl Pomeroy (ND), Dan Boren (OK), John Spratt (SC), Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD), Alan Mollohan (WV), Ron Kind (WI), and David Obey (WI).

These 50 legislators hold the key to moving ENDA through the US House of Representatives.

...

H.R. 3017, The Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009

H.R. 3017, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2009 (ENDA), was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives yesterday with 117 original co-sponsors. This bill would prohibit job discrimination across the United States that is motivated by sexual orientation or gender identity. It will significantly affect employers and employees in regard to these non-job-related criteria.

Bill Passage Prospects Are Good

The prospects for the bill’s passage in the House are considered very good, since 218 Representatives are neede for passage, and there are about 194 Representatives in favor as of the time of this writing. That leaves a gap of about 25 votes. However, with 95 of the Representatives yet to make their views known, 52 of which are Democrats, it is likely that work by advocates between now and the vote expected in the Fall, that those 25 votes will be secured. According to Mara Keisling, head of the National Center for Transgender Equality, this bill has twice as many co-sponsors as the last time a bill was introduced on this subject in 2007.

The Senate is considered a bit more difficult because of the fact that Senate constituencies are state-wide, and often include large groups of liberal, conservative and swing voters. However, with 59 Democrats in the Senate (60, if and when Al Franken of Minnesota is seated.), political observers suggest that it is probable the Senate will give it the green light. President Obama has stated that he will sign it.

Again, Social Networking in a Political Context

The campaign for ENDA is showing once again the potential of social networking in a political context, as it did during the 2008 election of President Obama. The Facebook campaign for “Inclusive ENDA” has over 2500 members, and uses introduces more refined political tools to a wider audience, such as a spreadsheet listing all U.S. Representatives and their positions available for public viewing. There is also quite a vigorous stream of Twitter traffic on the subject, which can be found by searching for #ENDA on Twitter. In fact, people are using Twitter to directly urge support for the bill to their U.S. Representatives who have a presence on Twitter.

These and other sophisticated technologies are being used to allows the electorate to connect more directly with the legislators who will vote on the bill. For example, the Facebook group provides a service that allows those interested in passage of the bill to sign up for meetings scheduled with their U.S. Representatives in their local districts in August.

The National Task Force, an LGBT group, is also providing a form that allows constituents to send a letter with the press of a button to their Representative. The ACLU has a similar form. The Task Force is also urging constituents to meet with their Representatives, providing contact information for Representatives’ district offices, along with sample meeting request letters, and other talking points and resources for those meetings in The Task Force ENDA Grassroots Toolkit, PFLAG's Bringing the Message Home, and a Visit Report Form to communicate with national organizers.

The Latest In A Long Series

Since 1975, 12 states and over 100 localities have enacted lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)-inclusive employment nondiscrimination statutes and ordinances, now covering nearly 40 percent of Americans. As of February 2009, 85% of the Fortune 500 companies had implemented non-discrimination policies that include sexual orientation, and more than one-third had policies that include gender identity. The passage of ENDA would provide a federal standard instead of the current patchwork quilt of protections that vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

ENDA will provide for the same procedures, and similar, but somewhat more limited, remedies as are permitted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Just as in Title VII, the bill specifically provides for a religious exemption, and does not apply to small businesses or the military. The full text of the bill can be viewed at the Library of Congress website.

PFLAG (Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), a national organization advocating for the bill, notes that, according to numerous surveys, over 60% of likely voters in the U.S. support an inclusive federal employment non-discrimination law. PFLAG also says that polling data from 2006 shows that voters are more likely to support a candidate who votes for an LGBT anti-discrimination law than they are to vote against such a candidate.

PFLAG recommends that in preparation for the potential passage of ENDA, U.S. employers should review their nondiscrimination and non-harassment procedures and make sure they extend to their LGBT employees. so employers may consider redefining their workplace fairness procedures so that they meet the same high standards. It also suggests a review of bereavement leave policies, non-FMLA leave of absence policies, and employment of relatives policies, among others, to ensure that they provide similar provisions and protections for LGBT employees.

More than 60 companies have joined the Human Rights Campaign’s Business Coalition for Workplace Fairness, a group of leading U.S. employers that support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

The bill is also supported by many civil rights organizations that are not LGBT organizations, such as the National Black Justice Coalition. "This long-awaited legislation would call on members of congress to take a meaningful stand to end workplace discrimination" remarked Interim Executive Director Dr. Sylvia Rhue. "NBJC is working with congressional leaders to push for significant progress towards ending homophobia-based harassment and bigotry."

The House Committee on Labor plans to hold hearings on the bill in July. Hearings were also held during the last iteration of the bill in 2007, specifically on the aspect of the bill relating to gender identity. These hearings can be viewed on YouTube, and provide useful insight into the need for gender identity protections.

The Path from Here

As noted above, there are 52 Democrats in the House in 24 states who are undecided on ENDA. There are also a number of Republicans who are undecided, but political observers suggest that these Democrats are the key to passage in the House. Advocates and opponents will be looking to these Members of Congress to decide whether the bill will be sent on to the Senate in the Fall.

After the bill is voted on in the House, it will be introduced in the Senate. When the bill reaches the floor of the Senate and is approved by a majority of the Senate, it will go to President Obama for signature. President Obama has indicated that he would sign such a bill.

...

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Employment Non-Discrimination Act May Appear Next Week

According to the Washington Blade, U.S. Representative Barney Frank will announce plans for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) next week. It will include protections for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people.

The bill has eight House co-sponsors, including four Democrats and four Republicans. Among the sponsors are gay House members Frank, Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), and Jared Polis (D-Colo.). The lead Republican sponsor is Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.). More are expected later.

The interview also discloses Frank's view that prospects for passing a trans-inclusive ENDA have improved significantly since 2007.

"Things have gotten better," Frank said Tuesday. "The transgender community is lobbying hard."

He also said a House hearing last year on discrimination encountered by transgender people helped build support for a non-discrimination bill with a gender identity provision.

"We know we have a healthy majority in the House for ENDA without transgender [protections]," he said. "So we are able now to focus our efforts on lobbying for transgender [protections]. We don't have to do the dual lobbying because we had that [previous] vote [on a gay-only version of the bill]." This may be an attempt to justify his decision to strip gender identity provisions from the bill, resulting in a vote in favor of a sexual-orientation only bill.

There are some concerns within the LGBT community about the exact language of the bill, and how it will address issues such as a religious exemption, small businesses and gender identity definitions.


...

Sunday, June 7, 2009

Webinar Recording available

I recently held a series of online webinars for corporate, government and higher education personnel on transgender workplace diversity, described here.

Click here to view Recording, or Click here to download Recording. Please let me know if you have problems with either of these links at jtwassociates@gmail.com

The webinar is approximately 40 minutes long. A link will open up in a new tab, where a slide labelled "Transgender Workplace Diversity Webinar" will appear. When it downloads (which should take about a minute), you can click on the arrow in the center of the side to begin the viewing. You will begin to hear my voice discussing the slides.

Move your cursor to the bottom of the slide to find controls that will allow you to pause, to move the viewing forward or backward, and to change the volume. These are translucent and may be hard to see. You can click your cursor anywhere on the slide to pause and to continue. I also suggest listening using earphones at a lower volume because of a slight buzz in the background.

Here is a general timeline of the webinar:

0:00 Introduction
1:15 Harvard Business Review Case Study Discussion (click here to see the full case)
3:45 Subject areas of webinar
4:00 Terminology
8:10 Law
13:45 Policies, Procedures and Guidelines
19:25 Facilities Usage (bathrooms and dressing rooms)
23:30 Co-worker Training
26:10 Publicly Available Resources
27:15 What might you need an outside consultant for?
34:10 Q&A
41:30 End

A series of 90 minutes webinars will be offered over the next 6 months on specific subtopics important to HR managers. Each webinar will cost $125 to participate. Please email me if you would like to register at jtwassociates@gmail.com. The schedule is as follows:

Wednesday July 15, 2009
Policy Drafting 12-1:30 pm (ET)

Tuesday, October 6, 2009
HR Generalist Training 12-1:30 pm (ET)

Tuesday, December 8
Coworker Training 12-1:30 pm (ET)

Tuesday, February 9, 2010 Client/Customer/Public Communications
12-1:30 pm (ET)

$125 per webinar.

...

Monday, June 1, 2009

Inclusive ENDA 2009: Can A Viral Facebook Campaign Make It Happen?

Crossposted from Pam's House Blend

Last week, Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts said that ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and, maybe, gender identity, will be reintroduced this month.

As many all remember all too well, in the last introduction of that bill in 2007, "gender identity" was originally included, but was later removed into a separate bill because it appeared to some in Congress that there was insufficient support for its inclusion. A lot of our community was outraged, but it also incited a lot of division. Some gay people wondered why this transgender issue should be important to them.

Word: Workplace fairness isn't an issue that's different for transgender folks. It's not an issue for gay people. It's an issue for everybody, straight or gay or transgender or whatever your identity may be.

Not content to sit around on our thumbs, we started a Facebook group called "Inclusive ENDA" last Friday. It's a campaign to educate Members of Congress about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. The co-chairs include Pam Spalding of Pam's House Blend, Bil Browning of Bilerico.com and Waymon Hudson of Bilerico Florida. As I write this, the membership in the group just passed 500. I think 5000 before the end of the month is not too much to expect.

Here's why you should join, and invite all of your friends to join and take action.


Representative Frank has consistently said that the key to making this happen is education of the Members of Congress. He has railed against the community's failure to educate Congress members from conservative states, citing this as the reason that the 2007 effort to pass an inclusive ENDA was aborted. In his interview, he said “Efforts to include transgender people have failed in New York, Massachusetts and Maryland,” he said. “It doesn’t get easier when you throw in South Carolina and Utah.”

Whether you find this infuriating or informative, this is the challenge of the Facebook Inclusive ENDA campaign. It will focus particularly on those Members of Congress who need more information on why an inclusive ENDA is important. The vision of the group is to spread the message of inclusion to all of Congress, particularly those most in need of hearing this message, and to educate them about why sexual orientation and gender identity protection is important for all people -- straight or gay or transgender.

Here is what we are asking you to do:

Please contact your US Representative today by calling the U.S. Capitol at 202-224-3121. Give the operator your zip code and ask for your Representative. Ask your Rep's office whether he or she has a position on an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and explain that means both sexual orientation and gender identity. Ask whether the position is definitely yes, probably yes, undecided, probably no or definitely no. Anything other than yes or no should go in the "undecided" category. Then, post it on the Wall at Inclusive ENDA (click here for the link), where it will be transferred to spreadsheets showing the position of all U.S. Representatives and Senators.

Do the same for your Senators.

Our next steps after this will be to contact those in the undecided columns and help to educate them about the importance of an inclusive ENDA.

Can we make an inclusive ENDA happen?

Honestly?

I don't know.

But I'm not sitting around waiting for someone to save me.

Sign up for our campaign now. Here's the link.

Together, we are strong.

...

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Asking Members of Congress about their support for inclusive ENDA

On the right side of this blog, there is a widget giving you an opportunity to ask the US Congress a question about their support for an inclusive ENDA. Click on "View More" to see the question, then click on "Vote" to add your voice to those requesting an answer. If enough votes are received, AskYourLawmaker.org will pose the question to all Members of Congress. The answers will show up in the widget, and you can check back to see how your Representatives answered the question.

...

Friday, May 29, 2009

Federal Bill on Employment Non-Discrimination Moving Forward

The Washington Blade this morning has an interview of Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts discussing the planned re-introduction of ENDA, the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, next month. The article suggests that the new bill will include not only "sexual orientation" as a protected category, but that it would also include the "gender identity" provision that would protect employees from discrimination based on non-conformity to gendered stereotypes of identity and expression. In the last introduction of that bill in 2007, "gender identity" was originally included, but was later removed into a separate bill because it appeared to some in Congress that there was insufficient support for its inclusion. This move was very controversial within the LGBT community.

The section of the article discussing ENDA is available by clicking here.

In a hopeful sign, Congressman Frank said he expects congressional hearings on ENDA before the measure sees a vote because lawmakers must still be educated on the bill’s gender identity provisions. This suggests that Congressional Democrats are now more committed to the necessary education efforts than at the time of the last introduction. While hearings were held on the issue of "gender identity" last time, they were held only after "gender identity" protection was stripped from the bill.

The politics and legal interpretation of ENDA are very complex. I will write a series of articles over the next weeks and months to highlight specific issues crucial to an understanding of this bill. These issues include the following:

  • How should gender identity be defined?
  • Does "gender identity" language protect employees other than transgender people?
  • What are the scope of the exemptions from coverage included in the bill?
  • Who supports ENDA, and why?
  • Who opposes ENDA, and why?
  • What education do Members of Congress need?
  • What should I tell my Congressperson?
  • How will the relationship between transgender advocates and the wider LGBT advocacy community play out in this go-round?
  • What has been the experience of organizations in jurisdictions with current gender identity protections?
  • What types of issues have come up with transgender workers in the workplace?
  • Is ENDA beneficial, detrimental, or neutral for the organizations that it covers?
ENDA is something that all human resources people should be aware of, whether pro or con. I hope to provide some useful contribution to that education.

...